If the world were perfect, it wouldn’t be.
Yogi Berra
Philosophy is where you find it.
The Story Of Three Umpires
There’s an urban legend around the American sport of baseball that has not only to do with perception and subjectivity, but about the very nature of reality itself.
It goes back at least a century. It is known as the story or joke about three umpires, and it describes a conversation between three referees and how they judge actions in the game of baseball.
The first umpire says: “There’s balls and there’s strikes, and I call ’em like they is.”
The second umpire says: “No, there’s balls and there’s strikes, and I call ’em like I see ’em.”
The third umpire says: “There’s balls and there’s strikes, but they ain’t nothin’ until I call ‘em.”
Baseball, to its ardent fans, is a surprisingly philosophical sport. Perhaps since games unfold at a leisurely 19th century pace there is plenty of time to think.
The aforementioned three umpires have starkly contrasting views of the nature of reality embedded in their pithy statements about their refereeing policies.
A Philosophy Of External Immutable Reality
The first umpire ascribes to the philosophy that there is an external immutable reality that has no particular relationship to the person perceiving it. Moreover, they are convinced that they have perfect access to this reality and merely have to report back this objective truth to the observers of the game.
In a world like the first umpire’s world, is there any place for art?
Wouldn’t all artists create the exact same art because they are reporting back a singular external truth?
But since all the artists are not the same, the art would vary, but it could still be objectively compared against a universally agreed upon reality and judged upon this basis.
This way of thinking places the emphasis on technical mastery, such as Audubon’s paintings of birds that are intended to help naturalists identify them in the wild. They’re beautiful because they are impeccably rendered and executed and constitute an impressive body of work.
A Philosophy Of Participatory Reality & The Space Of Subjectivity
The second umpire cracks the door open to a participatory reality. This umpire acknowledges that s/he lives in an imperfect world that is constrained and limited by her perceptions.
We talked about this in the blog post about Plato’s Cave and an art opening in Carmel where the lights went out because a tree fell in the forest, even though we didn’t hear it.
To reiterate, there is an objective reality but we only have access to bits and pieces of it. We have to use the power of contemplation to infer the existence of the higher truth from the flickering shadows that we are able to observe directly because of the limitations of our senses.
The second umpire has only one point of view and is not omniscient, and therefore acknowledges and tries to account for that limitation and does not claim to report the Truth.
The second umpire’s world has space for subjectivity, and therefore more room for art.
Even though there is agreement that there is an external ground truth, there is no law that says how one should access or infer this truth.
There are many paths to the mountaintop of enlightenment, but everyone agrees that there is a mountaintop destination where the paths converge.
This kind of art celebrates the point of view – a certain time of day, reflections on water, a certain mood. I think of Claude Monet’s studies of Rouen Cathedral, over 30 paintings of the same object under different circumstances (times of day, different weather conditions).
Monet acknowledged, explored, and celebrated the subjectivity of perception in this series of paintings. Everyone who sees them knows that it’s a cathedral in general and some are aware that it’s the Rouen Cathedral in particular, but that’s not the point. If it were, one painting would do.
Monet was taking a constraint, The Rouen Cathedral, and exploring the reaches of his imagination in regards to that particular motif.
Working with a particular constraint is a powerful practice and we’ve explored this topic on the blog recently when we talked about Occam’s Razor and earlier when we explored the power of simplicity and constraint in art.
A Philosophy On The Nature Of Perception & Consciousness
But it’s the third umpire we want to focus our attention on.
By saying that actions aren’t anything until they’re “called”, s/he is getting at the nature of perception and consciousness.
Giving something a name creates an identity that was not there before.
It is a profound simplification that allows us to navigate the world. Much of what we do is automatic and unconscious. For example, if we had to think about each step we take as we walk, it would encumber us in profound ways.
Sadly, in certain neurological conditions where one loses sensation on the bottom of one’s feet, a loss of proprioception, we no longer have the automatic awareness of where we literally stand and we lose balance. In this case, you must think through each step you take because you no longer feel it in your body. This becomes a situation of mind over matter, requiring vigilance and concentration to be aware of each step, and it tends to be exhausting.
In a previous blog post, we discussed the nature of simplicity and constraint, and naming gets at this process. Some naming conventions are straightforward, such as classifying things that are heavy, hard, cold, and inorganic as rocks. Others are more diffuse and slippery, such as desire or danger.
We give sets of sensory inputs names, but once we’ve done so, they take on a life of their own and these things we have learned to recognize on our own or through others become the cast of characters in the play we write every day. They become the scripts of our lives.
This is a double-edged sword.
It performs an essential simplification that allows us to compress the wealth of sensory input we receive and navigate life and make decisions, but it can also exclude and crowd out other information that could be important and valuable.
Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
Winston Churchill
Abstraction in art has deep underpinnings in how we perceive the world.
Abstract art belongs in the realm of the third umpire.
Abstract art is not referencing an agreed upon external reality like the first umpire (an accurate anatomical rendering of a bird) and often not even referencing a personally perceived objective reality like the second umpire (Rouen cathedral), but instead establishes that the process of perception and expression is a subject unto itself.
Abstract art does not depend on reproduction of an identifiable external reality to have meaning. It creates its own meaning out of its own components and the relationships between them.
This is why the concept of the adjacent possible is so important to the study of creativity.
Not only are the components of the artwork the creation of the abstract artist, so are the relationships between them.
As a work of art is put together, one move at a time, our mind looks for patterns in what has already happened. This guides the perception of what could happen next, the adjacent possible.
The word adjacent immediately begs the question, “Adjacent to what?”.
The word what asks after things. The artist defines the things that make up the piece of art, which in turn defines the unfolding of possibilities.
This is the true nature of abstraction.
“They ain’t nothing until I call ‘em”.
With gratitude from my studio to yours,
Nancy

Sample of work in an art journal. Get inspired with The Artist’s Journey Creativity Reflection Journal-Nancy Hillis
The new book with complimentary Creativity Immersion Program is here!
When you order my new book, The Artist’s Journey Creativity Reflection Journal, you get The Creativity Immersion Program, a complimentary Workshop exploring 5 pillars of creativity.
This is paired with 365 days of Creativity Prompts & Affirmations and a wonderful community!
You get this complimentary program when you purchase The Artist’s Journey Creativity Reflection Journal.
Register at: https://www.artistsjourney.com/bigcreativity.
You’ll get The Creativity Immersion Program plus 365 days of Creativity Prompts and Affirmations to inspire you in your big, juicy creative life.
Get the book.
P.S. I hope you enjoyed this exploration of existential philosophy via baseball. No deep understanding of baseball is required.
We make a case that abstraction in art has deep underpinnings in how we perceive the world.
And, to top it all off, we connect this foray into philosophical baseball to previous musings on the Adjacent Possible and Plato’s cave.
Leave me your comments below and share this with a friend.
Sugarlump,,,you incorporate so many disparate but delightful images in your philosophy,,,
I alternate between laughing out loud, to pausing to absorb and reflect on your writings.
I stopped painting yesterday when I didn’t feel the next move,,,It was getting ahead of me
which is when I usually go on to wildly react WITHOUT ANY DIALOGUE with it, and mess it up.
This morning the painting looks interesting enough to let sit, and I’ll work on others
which I am still able to handle as though “they ain’t nothin’ til I calls ’em”.
Your insights are invaluable, and of enormous help to me!
I like your evolving paintings, too! Great proof that you “walk your talk”
Blessings,
Anne
Hi Anne! I’m delighted that you’re enjoying these writings. I love that phrase: “they ain’t nothin’ til I calls ’em” and how you incorporated it into your practice.
Thanks you: re: evolving paintings…
Love,
Nancy
Dear Nancy,
Another Home Run!! What a Thinker! Leave it to you. Thank you Nancy for Sharing Your Insights!
I am always better for them. The adjacent possible in our lives and art. What a Joy! No Small Thing.
Always,
Marian
Dear Marian,
I knew you’d appreciate this one on the Yogi Berra analogy. Yes! The adjacent possible awaits us…
Warmly,
Nancy
“Jenny says” Beautifully stated Jenny! …and to Janet Simpson…don’t fret it! I was a docent in a major art museum for 18 years and then some…loved touring children but adults? Can’t doing the # of times I heard ‘I don’t know anything about art but I KNOW what I like…’ I always corrected their statement with ‘No, you only LIKE what you KNOW!” That translates into a person who has very limited knowledge and no curiosity. A boring person. Children are more likely to enjoy it so don’t fret!
I ordered you new book Nancy, and am working my way through it. Slowly, thoughtfully. Quite an experience! Now just how do I get/see those Creative Blogs?
Hi Margery,
Yes, children are the greatest. I sit at their feet and am awed by their sense of wonder and curiosity.
Thank you for ordering the book Margery. You can go to https://www.artistsjourney.com/bigcreativity and register for the Creativity Immersion Program and also get the daily Creativity Prompts.
Warmly,
Nancy
Hi Nancy,
I love the fact that all over the world, (I’m in Australia), readers of your blog can experience that sense of lightening, that ‘aha’ moment. Reading your words, and the meaning in these little tales, makes me feel recognition of something I didn’t know I knew.
Thank you, for your clarifying contact!
Warm regards,
Jenny
Oh I love that, Jenny! “Makes me feel the recognition of something I didn’t know I knew”. That’s beautiful. Thank YOU for being here.
Warmly,
Nancy
Hi Jenny,
Isn’t it wondrous that we can communicate across time and space? This is also what I love about books. Oh I love that: “makes me feel recognition of something I didn’t know I knew”. That’s fabulous.
Thank you for your lovely words and for being here.
Warmly,
Nancy
Another wonderful read , on a drizzly wet lovely day . This makes me reflect more on why some people just cannot -get- abstract art and my work even to the point of not giving it a second glance, to ponder , and to enjoy some sort of reaction, feeling or even new thought pattern.. I do do enjoy the very gifted way you write these blogs – who invented that word!??? Such thought provoking pieces.. Thanks Nancy . Janet
Hi dear Janet,
It’s always lovely to hear from you! Yes, don’t worry about those who don’t understand your art. You are stepping into the Unknown…and exploring deeply…and some may never understand or value it. But that’s ok. They may or may not ever see past the Cartesian grid they lay over experiences they don’t understand in a reductionistic attempt to make sense of and control it. No matter. What matters is that you continue your exploration, activate the deepest reaches of your imagination and live, continually, your most meaningful life.
Hi Janet,
Thank you so much for your kind words and for being here. I’m delighted that this post was enlightening to you on that issue.
Warmly,
Nancy
Thank you for clarifying so many puzzles.
Love reading what you write.
Thank you. Thank you.
Regi
Thank you so much Regi! I appreciate your kind words. I’m delighted that you’re loving this.
Warmly,
Nancy
Thank you Nancy. You elucidate stuff that is obscure to me. Notwithstanding I have painted for 40 years.
This gives me self confidence.
Great teaching.
Regi
Thank you Regi. I’m honored. That’s fantastic that you’ve painted for 40 years! Wow! Wonderful!
I’m so happy that this gives you self confidence. That’s a wonderful thing.
Warmly,
Nancy
Hi Nancy,
Your philosophical reflection with the 3 baseball umpires opens the door to every single artist. Thank you
Hi Luis,
Thank you so much! There are wonderful deep stories out that that can help artists and creators. Thank you for being here and for your kind words.
Warmly,
Nancy
Dear Nancy,
Everything you write is so wonderful! I hear your voice that is full of inspiration! You definitely have a talent for expressing psychological and philosophical concepts! I read everything you write with such pleasure… and miss you!
Much love,
Vera
Dear Vera,
Oh I love you so much. Thank you for being in my life. I’ve been thinking of your a great deal recently. Miss you too.
Much love to you,
Nancy